View Full Version : Bike Fund
natepac
06-19-2008, 09:34 PM
Ok who wants to donate to the NNB (Nates New Bike (http://www.salsacycles.com/bigmamaComp08.html)) fund?
egordon
06-20-2008, 06:32 AM
I'll dontate a bag of chips to go with your Salsa... Do you think Paul would let us borrow the PORC funds to goto the Boats? We could win 4 or 5 g's a piece and buy new bikes. And ofcourse return the funds with a $10 donation to PORC.
NoName2
06-20-2008, 08:14 AM
going to biloxi tonight. 100% of my losses will go towards nate's new bike. :pig:
Pilotman28
06-20-2008, 10:55 AM
I'm just waiting for a Truth '29er to come out. Now THAT will be a bike worth going to Biloxi for.
superdave
06-20-2008, 11:13 AM
I'm just waiting for a Truth '29er to come out. Now THAT will be a bike worth going to Biloxi for.
Can someone explain the advantages to a 29er full suspension bike? I get the whole 29er hardtail thing, but what are the other advantages to a larger wheel other than response to bumps/rolling over things? Why do you need a tire/wheel to do the suspension's job when you already have suspension? Theoretically, a 26" wheel should accelerate/brake quicker and corner faster. Not being critical here, just looking for enlightenment.
egordon
06-20-2008, 12:18 PM
1.5" more ground clearance?
scratchndent
06-20-2008, 10:45 PM
Having only ridden a hardtail 29 ( thanks Mark for letting me roll your big girl) i AM HOOKED. But I would think that it would be overkill for a bark-o-lounger with squishy wheels. Only ridden a few full suspension bikes but personally I prefer less maint. of the SS 29 hardtail. Less bumpy and sure footed with great response to the rider. Makes the adjustments to the trail really fluid
not having done much on a fs 29er, i can only speak for the hardtails...1st thing i noticed was the smoother riding...backwheel sticks to the ground like a fs 26er.....but the cornering to me was the most impressive thing - - the 2.0 29er tires hold the corners better than my 26er 2.5's - which negates (and then some) any of the assumed loss of handling of the larger wheels....log obs are easier too. it's a lot better on the road too. the only thing i find harder on the 29er is getting the front wheel into the air. not sure if that is the geometry, the fork weight, or both. i doubt i'll go back to a 26 in wheel...even thinking about selling the Moab on ebay.
superdave
06-21-2008, 10:25 AM
not having done much on a fs 29er, i can only speak for the hardtails...1st thing i noticed was the smoother riding...backwheel sticks to the ground like a fs 26er.....but the cornering to me was the most impressive thing - - the 2.0 29er tires hold the corners better than my 26er 2.5's - which negates (and then some) any of the assumed loss of handling of the larger wheels....log obs are easier too. it's a lot better on the road too. the only thing i find harder on the 29er is getting the front wheel into the air. not sure if that is the geometry, the fork weight, or both. i doubt i'll go back to a 26 in wheel...even thinking about selling the Moab on ebay.
Good info. I'm just a little perplexed as to why you would want a FS 29er. To me it seems a little gimmicky. Maybe, like you, some folks just prefer the "feel" of a 29 wheel.
natepac
06-25-2008, 12:42 PM
i put you question up on mtbr.com under the 29er section to see what their answer is. see here (http://forums.mtbr.com/showthread.php?p=4602628#post4602628).
lets see what they have to say
superdave
06-25-2008, 02:07 PM
i put you question up on mtbr.com under the 29er section to see what their answer is. see here (http://forums.mtbr.com/showthread.php?p=4602628#post4602628).
lets see what they have to say
The one sensible post among the other smart ass posts pretty much mirrors what Scott said, that it's just a personal preference to the way the ride feels. I'd be curious to ride one back-to-back with my bike to feel the difference.
Idoeyes
06-25-2008, 03:48 PM
If you have poo....fling it now.
That guys is OWT THERE!! There is no enlightenment unless you bring it.....um.....ok.
I think 29er are consideably better for sustained C.C. efforts than 26ers. Climbing at OM hurts way more on a 26 than a 29. BUT! To build up a descent FS 29 you have to spend some serious dollas!:$::$:
sandfly
07-03-2008, 12:26 PM
Another way to roll - 69er (http://www.cyclingnews.com/tech/2008/probikes/?id=travis_brown_trek69er08).
Something not mentioned, but I've heard shorter folks (less than 6' or so) might have a harder time adapting to 29" wheels. I did ride a 69er at the last demo day and thought it worked well for my short arse.
It is better to practice a little than talk a lot
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.